Friday 14 December 2012

WINOL Critical Reflection



It’s my final year on Winchester News Online (WINOL), the student journalism behemoth which has taken over my life for the last year and a half. This semester I took on the role of production editor, a role that I had wanted since my first semester when I was a lowly production lackey, sub editing things and sitting on the sound desk. As a whole I am proud of how the bulletin has run and how it has looked. It was pointed out to me the other day that it is rare to have a team on production at the start of a new year that only has one third year student. When I started on production we had Domonique, Justina and Jack all on production overseeing me, George and Dan, so to take a group of complete novices to a fairly well oiled machine I think I have done well.

I wish I had been able to innovate more as production editor; the website has moved forward so much but the bulletin is much the same as it always has been. Together with Dan as news editor we have implemented the ‘Coming Up’ feature most weeks, which broke the show up well, and we also tried a new credits style which threw to the website for the packages that didn’t make it into the bulletin. Only the coming up survived but the first semester with a new team is difficult; you have more chance for innovation in your second semester on WINOL  so I hope the second years will carry our solid foundations forward to really do some innovative things with the bulletin, now that the website has settled down. I feel I was slightly restricted by the studio but we have developed a system which allows us to light presenters better by recording Sport in advance, as the packages are often done on the Monday or Tuesday. If you look at the last bulletin, both Henry and Ali are well lit, not ghostly or even particularly shiny as presenters have been in the past. We tried having the presenter stand up during the headlines, in a similar way to ITV, but with the way our green screen works you don’t get the sense of perspective so that idea was ditched. We have changed our headlines, simplifying them with a new music bed that is easier to edit. We have retained the old Garage Band WINOL theme but the different bed means we can more easily drop stories from the bulletin, even if they aren’t originally in the headlines, by dragging and dropping any story we want into the timeline. In the final bulletin we our presenter sat with a laptop, something we couldn’t have done before as the sports presenter would have been sitting there. The laptop performs no real function but it looks professional and it also gives the presenter something to look up from when moving from VT to the next part of the script.

Aside from WINOL we had quite a few large scale projects which we hoped would really show what we’ve learnt and how big WINOL has become. We started with the BJTC awards. Henry organised us into a team before we had even started on WINOL and despite some people having never worked with the equipment before, we put on a show that impressed the BJTC and hopefully worried our rivals. On the subject of rivals we had never really had a true rival that we could hold our work up against before; we talk about Westminster and occasionally Southampton but this year we took the success of Goldsmith’s and their East London Lines website as a direct challenge to us, causing us to really put work in to gaining a higher Alexa ranking on our website in both the UK and Worldwide. We were a long way behind them at the beginning of the semester but with the Hampshire Police and Crime Commissioner Debate, the American Election and our week of daily 99 second news we were able to direct a lot of traffic to our site. Also, when plugging the bulletin on Facebook, Twitter and other social media we used to send our viewers to YouTube rather than the site, meaning we got a lot of views but the site suffered. This year though I was part of the decision to send people to the site for the bulletin, which meant a slight drop in viewers as it is a different system but increased the traffic for the site. At the end of my time as production editor  WINOL was the top student journalism site in the country as shown in the Alexa rankings where we were 479,411[1] in our global rank and 10,333[1] in our UK rank; over 10,000 places ahead in the UK rank of our nearest rivals in this country, the aforementioned East London Lines. This is to be commended and I think everyone on the team should be proud of this achievement now that we can confidently call ourselves the best student journalism and definitely the most widely viewed in the country. Special mention goes to Sam, website editor, who has overseen the change and Jason who has helped engineer it by taking us through the transition to the seemingly simpler WordPress system.

Another project we undertook was the Hampshire Police and Crime Commissioner Debate (HPCC), planned by our main politics reporter Louis O’Brien. In the weeks building up to it we had a lot of planning sessions; details changed, venues changed, and the university got involved but we were fairly confident that we could pull it off. All the third years involved were veterans of November 30th and me, Henry, Ewan, Flick and Sam were involved in the memorial service last year at a school, a job given to us by a professional production company so we knew we could do it. The scale of the event though was much larger as we had six candidates to look after and host, BBC South’s Alex Forsyth. We also had an audience of around 300 packed into the Stripe auditorium; add this to the online audience, streaming the event live on UStream and it was one of our most successful events. My role on the night was as a sort of director or perhaps a floor manager; there’s not much we could do about talkback and the like and Henry was running the camera output from the tricaster, although he had to rely on his camera people to give him good shots to choose from. It fell to me to time answers and try to keep Alex Forsyth informed as to whether she needed to hurry someone along or whether a candidate had longer for their opening statements. This was a big responsibility but fortunately Alex was a fantastic host and I hope that she appreciated my help.

The American elections saw us attempt to cover another big event, evolving from when WINOL covered the General Election in 2010 and attempting to do the same but on a much larger scale. It became obvious that this wouldn’t be possible, the programme would need to be a different kind of show and after changes and confusion from an organisational point of view we had a programme that would be two hours long, streamed live like the HPCC debate and that took the form of a discussion show with guests and experts, trying to argue over who would win the elections. The show was to be broadcast from nine o’clock but not in the contingency plan was the prospect of Obama winning before we went to air. This showed a real lack of planning but cannot be solely blamed on Ali as the head of the project. We should have encouraged Ali to involve other people in the plans sooner but other projects got in the way. On the day we came in and Ali was asking if we could take the show down to a 15 minute bulletin, the same length as a normal WINOL but I knew this wouldn’t be possible. A two hour long show had been promised and that was what we were going to put out. I was director for the whole two hours and it was a very steep learning curve. I volunteered to direct the show since no one else seemed like they wanted the job, despite having only directed one WINOL before;  that gave me more experience than some but it was still a lot of pressure. I think if you compare my directing style during the two hours (which was frantic at best) to my directing during the bulletin that afternoon where it was decided I would also take the helm, I was a much more accomplished director, keeping everyone in the gallery informed as well as the presenter who often feels a little bit lost and alone in the studio. I think the whole experience taught me a lot about directing and has shown me that it is something I would really like to pursue; nothing on WINOL, except perhaps occasionally turning my hand to presenting, has given me a greater buzz than being in control of that gallery.

In our final week of WINOL we decided we would have a daily news update in the style of BBC Three’s 60 seconds. It was to be called 99 news and a unit was put together to produce the bulletins, whilst I stayed focused on putting out our final bulletin of the semester and my final bulletin altogether. The show was very polished and made its one o’clock deadline every day bar the Monday. It gives us the distinction of being the only student run organisation to boast daily news broadcasts, most journalism courses only do one news day a term, and not only do we do WINOL weekly but we now have a pretty viable plan for daily news updates which I personally think could be carried forward into next semester. I also got involved with the radio, being a regular newsreader during WINOL’s Tuesday takeover as it was called. I really like radio as a medium and was quite glad to get some experience, no matter how small, on my CV before I left.

I would have liked to direct the final week of WINOL but it is no longer about us, the third years, it is about passing the torch so to speak to another team of hopefully bright young things who will continue to build upon the solid foundation I think we have laid out. I worry a little about production because although I encouraged members of my production team to get training on lighting, made sure they were officially studio trained and to learn things like the tricaster, I’m not sure this ever happened. And with many of them wanting to try their hand at news or sport next semester before deciding where they really want to be on WINOL, I worry that not many people will have the production skills I taught to my group, who have been a superb help and very good at following instructions. The main worry for me at the start of the semester was how I would cope with the added pressure of having a team of people working under me, and I think I was able to cope a lot better because of the quality of the team. They all had a chance to direct except Nicole who would have been director in the last week if she hadn’t had to disappear due to a problem at home. However I am pleased to say that Ben did a great job, learning a lot over the intervening weeks between that and the first WINOL which he also directed. It was criticised by some that I let a second year direct the first couple of weeks but I think throwing them in at the deep end was necessary to give them the fear that all journalists should live by. I am therefore extremely happy with how this term has gone and how my time as production editor has come to a close. Long may WINOL’s dominance continue.


[1] Alexa rankings correct as of 13th December 2012

Monday 10 December 2012

FOI not MOI - Investigative Journalism

I don't even know if the joke in the title is funny... or even a joke. But this is the last blog of this semester so let's get into it and get it over with.

In journalism the news agenda is not set by the journalist; we do not decide what to write about. In investigative journalism though the point is that the story should not be on the agenda. For an example from WINOL look at a story from the start of my second year where Julie Cordier investigated how many Hampshire police officers had previous convictions. You can view the story on YouTube here but the important thing here is that police officers with convictions was not a topic on the agenda, it was just a story that Julie had basically made up and then used the system of FOI requests to back it up and get the information she needed to make the story work. Often, investigative journalism is close in form to gonzo or presenter led journalism. During the lecture, Chris gave us an example where this was the case with his book True Blue. It wasn't something on the news agenda that they went to investigate and it is presenter led or more likely gonzo. If you're still unsure about investigative journalism then it is important to remember the big things in the history of the form like Emile Zola's famous J'Accuse or the investigation into the convictions of the Birmingham Six. Miscarriages of justice are the things that journalists will most often look to investigate because the reasons behind them can often be very much in the public interest, a corrupt government, a conspiracy; all good journalism topics. It was good to have a lecture on this subject as it directly influenced my thoughts about my FYP which is on the Innocence Project. For people who haven't heard of it or if I haven't written about it before, the Innocence Project was started in America for prisoners on death row who were still pleading not guilty despite many trials and appeals. It eventually was transferred over here and now university courses (mainly in law) can take on cases from prisoners in the UK who are still imprisoned for crimes they claim they didn't commit.

Back to the lecture though and Chris then went on to talk about a lady who is a hero to journalists although you may not have heard of her. Before our newsroom got a revamp her picture was on the wall but her story is worth more than that. Veronica Guerin was a journalist in Ireland during 'the troubles' who began investigating the crime lords of Ireland when no one else would. It was when she began to investigate drug dealers that she began to receive several death threats; shots fired into her home, a gunman at the door, threats over the phone. Her murder was an attack on democracy and the real irony is that two days after her death she was due to speak at a conference in London where her topic was "Dying to Tell the Story: Journalists at Risk." It wasn't the first time a journalist had been killed while investigating a story and it won't be the last but Guerin's story is one that should inspire rather than deflate us. Her pioneering work almost certainly did more to highlight the issue of drug crime in Ireland and whilst it cost her her life, her work will never be forgotten.

FOI requests are not just for journalists and can be made by anybody, yes YOU unsuspecting reader who wasn't prepared for me to address them directly. Websites like whatdotheyknow.com allow you to browse and make your own requests which could be responded to if you ask in a particular way. The people on the end of those requests will do everything they can to avoid answering so you need to be specific and you need to be prepared for disappointment. Two reporters over the last semester of WINOL had a huge amount of FOI requests out, submitted over the summer and despite their hard work were unable to make any of them work and these are our best reporters. Sometimes you're not asking the right questions or the idea just isn't going to turn up anything interesting.

This might be my last blog for a while apart from the WINOL Critical Reflection which should be above so...

Until Next Time. Stay Classy Internet.